|
REFRACTION/REFRACTOMETRY
A New Role for the Contemporary
Optician |
|
As discussed in last month’s article, there are many
things Opticians can do beyond the traditional dispensing
role. We have talked about contact lenses and management so
far, and this month we will be evaluating a bit more
controversial role, that of Refraction, or as some people
like to call it, Refractometry. We are not trying to make
“junior eye docs” here, just teaching a skill set that
can help Opticians serve in clinical roles with the OD and
MD. It is a natural progression, and hopefully this article
will provide some information that is useful. |

|
Basic Procedures
Refraction is defined as “the act of determining the
focal condition (emmetropia or various ametropias) of the
eye and its correction by optical devices, usually
spectacles or contact lenses” (Keeney, et al., 1995, p.
254). This article is designed to introduce the subject to
those interested, and to provide some continuing education
for others already involved in the process. While the
process may seem confusing to some, once learned, it becomes
almost second nature.
Pre-Tests
There are a number of pre-tests that can tell us a great
deal. Included are:
-
pupil measurement
-
visual acuity with and without current Rx
-
pupillary reflexes
-
ocular motility tests (broad H test, etc.)
-
near point of convergence
-
range of accommodation
-
cover tests
-
stereopsis
-
color vision screening
-
observation of the external adnexa
-
pin-hole acuity
I will not go into specific detail about these
procedures, but I do want to call your attention to the
pin-hole acuity test. As mentioned earlier, it is imperative
to recognize when to refer. The pin-hole acuity test will
clearly indicate whether or not a refractive condition is
present, or if the blurred image is caused by something
else. As you recall from basic optics, central light rays
come to focus at a different place than peripheral rays
(commonly referred to as spherical aberration). Placing a
pin-hole before the eye will cause a substantial improvement
in visual acuity in someone with a moderate or greater
refractive error. If a pin-hole shows no improvement, the
error may not be refractive and needs to be referred.
Subjective Procedures
There are many ways to find the refractive status of the
eye. In the old days of refraction, everything was done
totally on the subjective response of the patient. Today, we
still depend a great deal on those subjective responses to
help us arrive at the perfect neutralization.
Refraction can be accomplished using entirely subjective
means. Using a “guide” called Eggers Chart logic, one
can gauge the rough amount of ametropia present, if any.
Eggers Chart logic uses the premise that each line away from
emmetropia on the Snellen chart represents approximately
.25-.50 diopters of ametropia. Someone who reads 20/40 on
the Snellen Chart will have a rough ametropia of
approximately .75 diopters. Eggers Chart logic does not tell
us what ametropia, merely how much. From that information we
can readily judge whether the subject is a myope or hyperope
by utilizing trial lenses.
The world would be a wonderful place if that were
all there was to it, but something called astigmatism is
around to mess up our day.
Astigmatism can be detected by using a couple of
subjective techniques. The first we will talk about is the
“clock dial.” This technique uses a plus lens to “fog”
the patient to approximately 20/40, typically 3 clicks of
plus power above best acuity with the “rough” sphere. A
dial that looks like the hands on a clock is placed at 20
feet, and the patient is to report if one set of hands on
the clock looks clearer. If all the hands on the clock are
equal, no astigmatism exists; if one set of hands is clearer
or sharper, then there is astigmatism present. The axis can
be determined by multiplying the lower numbered hand on the
clock by thirty. For example, if the patient reports the 2
and 8 o’clock positions to be clearest, then the axis
would be 60 degrees.
We can also find astigmatism subjectively by utilizing
the Jackson Crossed Cylinder on the phoropter. The JCC is a
lens with a spherical equivalent of plano (-0.25/+0.25;
-0.50/+0.50) used for a number of tests. It features a set
of red dots, meaning minus power, and a set of white dots,
plus power. By placing one of those sets of dots on the
principal meridians, you can find the presence of
astigmatism. It is difficult to adequately describe here;
you need to see it and touch it to understand it, but for
now, I want you to know it will work.
Once a rough idea of what refractive error is determined,
we must refine, or “fine tune,” our findings. To do
that, we again utilize the JCC, but this time the dots are
positioned at a 45-degree angle to the axis. By simply
bracketing around the axis, we can find the exact axis
location. You cannot find the correct power without first
finding the axis.
Once that is accomplished we move on to refine the power.
This refinement is again accomplished by placing the dots on
the JCC on top of the axis. By asking which looks better –
red or white dots – we can easily find the right cylinder
power. Red indicates a minus and white plus. Again, this is
extremely difficult to get across in this fashion, but, if
you have a phoropter at your disposal, you should take a
look at it to gain a better understanding.
There is still one more thing we have to do before
proceeding on to the other eye; we must make certain we are
not over-minused; to give too much minus power can cause a
problem with accommodation and convergence. Minus power will
stimulate the accommodative reflex. We have a couple of
different ways available to us to monocularly balance a
patient. The first is the red-green or duochrome test. As
you know, the red component in white light comes to focus at
a different place than green. By showing the patient a 20/40
line and a colored slide with half the letter in green and
half in red, we can determine if we are balanced. If the
patient favors red, it indicates too much plus. If green is
favored, too much minus. Either way we must adjust
accordingly.
The second monocular balancing technique employs a
three-click blue. We earlier presented Eggers Chart and
described a 20/40 test line being approximately 0.75
diopters away from emmetropia. The same idea is employed
here. If we dial in three “clicks” of plus power (each
small movement of the large sphere wheel on the phoropter is
0.25) then the 20/40 line should be blurry. If it takes six
clicks, then we have too much minus power. Go back three
clicks, and you should be at the optimum monocular
refraction. Remember, when doing refraction it is best to
leave the patient at the maximum plus. MPMVA means Maximum
Plus for Maximum Visual Acuity. That is a good acronym to
remember.
Once we have completed the balancing procedures on the
right eye, all of the same steps must be done for the left,
from rough sphere to red-green. When they are accomplished,
one final step remains: binocular balancing. This is simply
accomplished by fogging the patient, and splitting the two
images with a dissociating prism (Borish, Vol. 2, 1970, p.
753). There is a 6-diopter prism on the phoropter that will
move the right image down. By looking at the two images
simultaneously, the patient is asked if both images are
equal, or if one is better than the other. If one is better,
we add +0.25 to that better image and ask again. Usually
this will correct the balance and the basic refraction is
complete. Once the fog is removed, the data collection is
complete. An additional step some refractionists do is to
complete a binocular 3-click blur, just to be certain we are
at MPMVA.
Next month we will continue with Objective Procedures and
additional testing procedures.
References on request
|